Chinese Medicine Times : Keeping You Informed

Chinese Medicine Times : Keeping You Informed

Comparison of effectiveness and safety between granules and decoction of Chinese herbal medicine: A systematic review of randomized clinical trials




The clinical use of Chinese herbal medicine granules is gradually increasing. However, there is still no systematic review comparing the effectiveness and safety of granules with the more traditional method of herbal decoctions.


A literature search was conducted using China National Knowledge Infrastructure Databases (CNKI), Chinese Science and Technology Periodical Database (VIP), China Biomedical Database web (CBM), Wanfang Database, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library until March 10, 2011. Clinical controlled trials (CCTs) including randomized trials (RCTs) comparing the effectiveness and safety between Chinese herbal medicine granules and decoction were included. Two authors conducted the literature searches, and extracted data independently. The assessment of methodological quality of RCTs was based on the risk of bias from the Cochrane Handbook, and the main outcome data of trials were analyzed by using RevMan 5.0 software. Risk ratio (RR) or mean difference (MD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) were used as effect measure.


56 clinical trials (n=9748) including 42 RCTs and 14 CCTs were included, and all trials were conducted in China and published in Chinese literature. 40 types of diseases and 15 syndromes of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) were reported. Granules were provided by pharmaceutical companies in 13 trials. The included RCTs were of generally low methodological quality: 7 trials reported adequate randomization methods, and 2 of these reported allocation concealment. 10 trials used blinding, of which 5 trials used placebo which were delivered double blind (blinded participants and practitioners). 98.2% (55/56) of studies showed that there was no significant statistical difference between granules and decoctions of Chinese herbal medicine for their effectiveness. No severe adverse effects in either group were reported.


Although our results suggest there was no difference between Chinese herbal medicine granules and decoctions in their effectiveness and safety, the poor methodological quality of most of the included trials means that we are unable to reach a definitive conclusion that both Chinese herbal medicine granules and decoctions have the same degree of effectiveness and safety in clinical practice. Further more rigorous research comparing granules with herbal decoctions is required but this preliminary evidence supports the continued use of granules in clinical practice and research.

Back To Latest Articles and News

Email This Page
Discuss This

Subscribe To CMT

Shopping Basket

Your basket is empty!

Recently Viewed Login Register

Change Language

Change Currency

Subscribe to our RSS Feed Chinese Medicine Times Facebook Fan Page Chinese Medicine Times Twitter Page Chinese Medicine Times Linkedin Page Email a friend about this website
  • Aculux KS needles
  • TeWa Needle Advert
  • ASP Needle advert
  • Seirin needle advet box (basic)

Events Calendar

Pulse Diagosis Part 2 ( Sunday 12th June 2016)

This Practical Workshop will focus on developing concentration [more]

Pulse Diagnosis Part 1 (Sunday 24th April 2016)

The pulse is the most important diagnosis tool in classic chinese medicine [more]

View Events Calendar

From Our Store

Bollmann Promed Bag, Black

Bollmann Promed Bag, Black

Karl Bollmann of Germany ...
Spring Handle Needle Injector

Spring Handle Needle Injector

South Korean spring handl...
Il Hwa Korean Ginseng Capsules 500mg x 100

Il Hwa Korean Ginseng Capsules 500mg x 100

Il hwa Korean Ginseng Cap...
Pathology Illustrated, 6th Edition

Pathology Illustrated, 6th Edition

by Robin Reid and Fiona R...
Plinth 2000 502 Hydraulic Couch

Plinth 2000 502 Hydraulic Couch

Unique lifetime guarantee...
The Primacy of Spirit

The Primacy of Spirit

by Lonny Jarrett